dsllibre.org

borikua wrote:sip, tengo q decirlo pq eres el unico q dice semejante cosa d mozilla vulevo y te repito me he cansado de ir por distintos lados y eres la unica persona q he visto sostiene esa aseveracion.........burbuja yo! jajajaja

tu lo has dicho no me interesa, jajaj por lo unico q te lo dije es q como presumes q estoy parcializado........pero sigue pa'lante y ya q mencionas q eres programdor q bueno me alegro......q no tenga q visitar tu bastardized html

borikua wrote:Firefox is standards compliant, renders correct HTML in the right way
Poke him with sticks for being wrong
the guy apparently oblivious to fact
IE's engine does not define the standards of the Internet. The W3C, via Gecko, defines the standards of the Internet. Nothing that Microsoft says or does is going to change that; in fact, IIRC they have already begun to make MSHTML more standards-compliant.
IE is based off of old and out-dated standards, and tries to make up for them in buggy/non-standard ways



gracias a Dios q no lo haces!!!!


ps
se me olvidaba mencionar q a veces problemas viendo ciertas paginas no son culpa ni del webmaster ni del team d mozilla pueden ser culpa del usuario q instala una extension no recomendada o no actualizada, ese detalle se me paso mencionar pero ahora q lo recorde lo puse

por cierto hice un test gamespot se ve perfecto en firefox al igual q endi gamespot se veia mal si utilizo TBE d lo contrario perfecto.......tambien hay q tomar en cuanta como instalaste firefox no todos somos tan sabios d saberlo hacer sin ofensas personales y si me di la patá en el pecho!!!!

Poke him with sticks for being wrong
the guy apparently oblivious to fact

borikua wrote:

Poke him with sticks for being wrong
the guy apparently oblivious to fact

esos viene d fansites y no te escribo mas pq bendito........ los otros no; son hechos lamentablemente tu no los kieres aceptar asi q sigue tu en la burbuja q tu dices q yo estoy

si supieras los privados q he recivido diciendo lo patetico q debes ser como programador....pero eso ni a ti, ni a mi ni a nadie le interesa

tu punto, no me hagas reir q me orino encima


Firefox is standards compliant, renders correct HTML in the right way



IE purposely broke the standards and made use of its own method of doing it so that people would HAVE to use IE in order to get many web sites to work. This is approach gives MS control over a substantial portion of the internet. Without free "standardized" browsers, MS would have complete control and could determine what operating systems, companies, or even individuals could have access to the internet. Every new release of IE could contain new features that all of the web sites would HAVE to comply to and (perhaps even pay for).


yo estare en una burbuja pero la mia es clear lamentablemente la tuya es te impide mirar hacia afuera

borikua wrote:por favor d educar no me hables q no te cabe el titulo


y no se pq crees q yo pienso q me atacas (se la palabra atacar por puro vacilon), mijo sal d la burbuja y sabes deberias d visitar sites q te informen de como es q trabja mozilla, firefox e IE antes d hablar

y solo para tu info no visito fansites obviamente el desconocimiento de los sites los cuales te he conseguido la info te hace penar asi, yo te entiendo el trabajo produce esas cosas al menos llego le fin de semana quizas ahoira puedas ver un poco el sol y la mente se te aclare

y aunke aprezca no tengo guerra a muerte como dijo el mismo no existe tal cosa como el mejor......solo existe FIREFOX:P

The Mozilla Foundation has released version 0.8 of Mozilla Firebird, but with a slick new name, “Firefox”. As the browser proceeds toward its much anticipated 1.0 version release, it continues to please many people with its clean lines, fast rendering, and of course - excellent commitment to web standards.

Along with the Firefox release, there's an updated preview version available for Mozilla Thunderbird, The Mozilla Project's entry in enterprise level email software.

What can we say? Go go Mozilla!

The problem
Ignoring this situation would have been the simplest solution. But browser vendors were aware that both authors and visitors will blame the browser if the old pages, which used to look fine in the old browser, all of a sudden don't look right in the new browser. Therefore, compliance with W3C recommendations became a problem.

The solution
Therefore, both Microsoft and Mozilla decided to do something about it. The solution was two different rendering modes: The first mode, known as quirk or compatible mode, renders the pages like the old, incompatible browsers used to. The second mode, known as standard or compliant mode, renders them like the pages should be rendered according to W3C recommendations. The technical details about these modes can be found in the browser documentation mentioned below.

The big question now is: How does the browser decide which rendering mode he will use for a particular page? This question could be answered in a number of ways, of course. Both Microsft and Mozilla decided to use the document type declaration (or the lack thereof): If the document type declaration is of type a, then switch into standard mode. If the document type definition is of type b, or if no document type definition is found, then switch into quirk mode.

That's how it stands today. For further information use the links listed below: W3C Doctypes, Browser documentation, Articles and opinions, Standard support. For a tabular summary of all browsers that do doctype switching and, most important, when they switch into which mode, see the doctype switch table, a work in progress.